Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:1558-1565, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.06.003
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, S.
Right arrow Articles by Imaizumi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, S.
Right arrow Articles by Imaizumi, T.

Morphologic changes in infarct-related plaque after coronary stent placement

A serial angioscopy study

Shunta Sakai, MD*, Kyoichi Mizuno, MD, FACC*,*, Shinya Yokoyama, MD*, Jun Tanabe, MD*, Takuroh Shinada, MD*, Koji Seimiya, MD*, Masamichi Takano, MD*, Takayoshi Ohba, MD*, Masato Tomimura, MD*, Ryota Uemura, MD* and Takahiro Imaizumi, MD*

* Department of Cardiovascular Center, Chiba-Hokusoh Hospital, Nippon Medical School, Chiba, Japan



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
figure 1 Coronary angioscopy procedures. *failure of the angioscopy procedure was defined as when the angioscope could not visualize the entire circumference of the target lesion in order for it to be adequately evaluated or if it could not reach to the target lesion because of a tortuous proximal vessel.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
figure 2 Changes in the incidence of thrombus and intimal flap. the intimal flap was assessable in 28 of 39 lesions at baseline. in the 11 remaining lesions, the intimal flap could not be seen because it occupied the lumen due to occlusive thrombus. *p < 0.01 vs. protruding thrombus at baseline. {dagger}p < 0.01 vs. protruding thrombus immediately after balloon angioplasty. #p < 0.01 vs. lining thrombus immediately after stenting. {ddagger}p < 0.01 vs. intimal flap immediately after balloon angioplasty. solid bars = protruding thrombus; hatched bars = lining thrombus; open bars = intimal flap.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
figure 3 Changes in the plaque surface (a) and color (b) after stenting. *p < 0.01 vs. immediately after stenting and one-month follow-up.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
figure 4 Changes in the stent coverage score after stenting. data are presented as the mean value ± sd.

 


View larger version (66K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Serial angioscopic images. (A) At baseline, a protruding mixed thrombus was seen. (B) Immediately after balloon angioplasty, a protruding thrombus and intimal flap were seen. (C) Immediately after stenting, a wide vessel lumen was obtained by the stent. (D) At one-month follow-up, a lining thrombus was seen. (E) At one-month follow-up, there was partial neointimal coverage (coverage score = 1). (F) At six-month follow-up, there was smooth and white plaque (coverage score = 4) without thrombus. F = intimal flap; GW = guide wire; L = lumen; YP = yellow plaque; T = thrombus.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement