cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:1460-1462, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)01045-3
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warner Stevenson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warner Stevenson, L.

The points for pacing*

Lynne Warner Stevenson, MD, FACC{dagger},*

{dagger} Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Estimated impact of successful biventricular (Bi-V) pacing in patients typical of those in the major trials. Good quality of life is calculated as 105 minus the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score (therefore, a higher score is better on this graph), shown in open bars. Solid bars are peak oxygen consumption (VO2) during exercise testing. For comparison, average values at baseline are superimposed from the population with mild-to-moderate heart failure in the Vasodilator Heart Failure Trials (V-HeFT) (3).

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home