Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:1380-1386, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)01050-7
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webb, J. G.

Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK trial

John G. Webb, MD, FACC*,*, April M. Lowe, MS{dagger}, Timothy A. Sanborn, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Harvey D. White, DSc§, Lynn A. Sleeper, ScD{dagger}, Ronald G. Carere, MD, FACC*, Christopher E. Buller, MD, FACC||, S. Chiu Wong, MD, FACC, Jean Boland, MD#, Vlad Dzavik, MD**, Mark Porway, MD, FACC{dagger}{dagger}, Gordon Pate, MB*, Geoffrey Bergman, MD, FACC, Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC{ddagger}{ddagger} for the SHOCK Investigators

* St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
{dagger} New England Research Institutes, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA
{ddagger} Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, Illinois, USA
§ Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
|| Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
New York Presbyterian, New York, New York, USA
# CHR Citadelle, Liege, Belgium
** Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
{dagger}{dagger} Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
{ddagger}{ddagger} Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Flowchart of SHOCK Trial patients. CABG = coronary artery bypass graft surgery; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Relationship of stent implantation in the culprit artery and one-year survival in SHOCK trial patients assigned to early revascularization and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Relationship of final angiographic culprit artery Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade after percutaneous coronary intervention and 30-day survival in SHOCK trial patients assigned to early revascularization.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Time trends in the interventional management of cardiogenic shock and one-year survival. A significant increase in the use of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (p = 0.018), stents, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (both <0.001) was observed. One-year survival and PCI success rates were similar over time (p = 0.889 for survival and p = 0.128 for success).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement