Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:1208-1214, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00949-5
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sedrakyan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Krumholz, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sedrakyan, A.
Right arrow Articles by Krumholz, H. M.

Age does not limit quality of life improvement in cardiac valve surgery

Artyom Sedrakyan, MD*, Viola Vaccarino, MD, PhD{dagger}, A. David Paltiel, PhD*, John A. Elefteriades, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Jennifer A. Mattera, MPH§, Sarah A. Roumanis, RN§, Zhenqiu Lin, PhD§ and Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, FACC*§||,*

* Division of Health Policy and Administration, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
{dagger} Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, and Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
{ddagger} Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
§ Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
|| Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA



View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Quality of life (QOL) values with 95% confidence intervals in the ≤64-year age group (combined mitral and aortic patients). Open boxes = pre-operative QOL scores; open circles = 18-month follow-up QOL scores; closed triangles = U.S. population QOL norms for the ≤64-year age group. BP = bodily pain; GH = general health; MCS = mental component summary; MH = mental health; PCS = physical component summary; PF = physical functioning; RE = role emotional; RP = role physical; SF = social functioning; VT = vitality.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Quality of life (QOL) values with 95% confidence intervals in the 65- to 74-year age group (combined mitral and aortic patients). Open boxes = pre-operative QOL scores; open circles = 18-month follow-up QOL scores; closed triangles = U.S. population norms for the 65- to 74-year age group. BP = bodily pain; GH = general health; MCS = mental component summary; MH = mental health; PCS = physical component summary; PF = physical functioning; RE = role emotional; RP = role physical; SF = social functioning; VT = vitality.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Quality of life (QOL) values with 95% confidence intervals in the ≥75-year age group (combined mitral and aortic patients). Open boxes = pre-operative QOL scores; open circles = 18-month follow-up QOL scores; closed triangles = U.S. population norms for the ≥75-year age group. BP = bodily pain; GH = general health; MCS = mental component summary; MH = mental health; PCS = physical component summary; PF = physical functioning; RE = role emotional; RP = role physical; SF = social functioning; VT = vitality.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement