JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:998-1003, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00909-4
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Beach, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laskey, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Beach, D.

Frequency and clinical significance of ischemic preconditioning during percutaneous coronary intervention

Warren K. Laskey, MD, FACC*,* and Dana Beach, RN*

* Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 (A) (left panel) Histogram depicting the distribution of ST segment shift (mV) during the first inflation in patients manifesting ischemic preconditioning (IP). The median (25th, 75th percentile) values were 10.0 (9.0, 12.0) mV. In all panels, the number of patients is indicated on the y-axis. (Right panel) Histogram depicting the distribution of ST segment shift (mV) during the second inflation in patients manifesting IP. Notice the overall shift to the left of the distribution indicating a significant reduction in the magnitude of ST segment elevation during Inflation 2. The median (25th, 75th percentile) values were 5.0 (4.0, 6.0) mV. (B) (left panel) Histogram depicting a bimodal distribution of ST segment shift (mV) during the first inflation in patients failing to manifest IP. Notice the overall leftward shift compared with A, indicating a reduced extent of ST segment elevation. The median (25th, 75th percentile) ST segment shift was 6.0 (2.0, 8.0) mV. (Right panel) Histogram depicting the distribution of ST segment shift (mV) during the second inflation in patients failing to manifest IP. The distributions are virtually superimposable, indicating no overall change from the first to second inflations. The median (25th, 75th percentile) ST segment shift was 6.0 (2.0, 8.0) mV.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier plot of the estimated rates of freedom from death or non-fatal MI during the year after hospital discharge. There was a highly statistically significant reduction in event-free survival (log-rank p = 0.001) in patients failing to manifest ischemic preconditioning (IP) during PCI.

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.