Angiographic variables predict increased riskfor adverse ischemic events after coronarystenting with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition
Results from the TARGET trial
Mitchell J. Ross, MD*,
Howard C. Herrmann, MD, FACC*,*,
David J. Moliterno, MD, FACC
,
James C. Blankenship, MD, FACC
,
Laura Demopoulos, MD
,
Peter M. DiBattiste, MD, FACC
,
Stephen G. Ellis, MD, FACC
,
Ziyad Ghazzal, MD, FACC||,
Jack L. Martin, MD, FACC¶,
Jennifer White
and
Eric J. Topol, MD, FACC
* Division of Cardiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Division of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Division of Cardiology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, USA
|| Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
¶ Division of Cardiology, Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, USA

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Incidence of 30-day (A) and 6-month (B) primary composite end point according to the presence of high-risk angiographic features. *p < 0.05. MI = myocardial infarction; TVR = target vessel revascularization.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Incidence of the 30-day primary composite end point according to the presence of angiographic variables: thrombus, lesion eccentricity, or lesion length >20 mm. MI = myocardial infarction; TVR = target vessel revascularization.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Incidence of the six-month secondary composite end point according to the presence of angiographic variables: thrombus, lesion eccentricity, or lesion length >20 mm. MI = myocardial infarction; TVR = target vessel revascularization.
|
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.