Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:201-208, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00572-2
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berger, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Krumholz, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berger, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Krumholz, H. M.

Aspirin, beta-blocker, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with end-stage renal disease and an acute myocardial infarction

Alan K. Berger, MD*{dagger},*, Sue Duval, PhD{dagger} and Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, FACC{ddagger}§||¶

* Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
{dagger} Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
{ddagger} Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
§ Section of Health Policy and Administration, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
|| Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Qualidigm, Middletown, Connecticut, USA



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Aspirin, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were less likely to be provided to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than those without ESRD. In an analysis of patients considered ideal for the individual therapies, the overall administration rates were higher, but patients with ESRD still remained less likely to receive the therapy than those without ESRD. The p value for each comparison between ESRD and non-ESRD patients was <0.001.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Thirty-day mortality was dramatically reduced by the administration of aspirin (ASA) during the hospitalization. The p value for each mortality comparison between patients taking ASA and those not receiving ASA was <0.001. The relative risk reduction in mortality was significantly greater for patients without end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than for those with ESRD in the entire cohort (63% vs. 50%, p = 0.01). After restricting the cohort to patients ideal for ASA, the reduction in mortality provided by aspirin therapy remained greater in the non-ESRD group, although it was no longer statistically significant (65% vs. 53%, p = 0.10).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Thirty-day mortality was dramatically reduced by the administration of beta-blockers during the hospitalization. The p value for each mortality comparison between patients taking beta-blockers and those not receiving beta-blockers was <0.001. The relative reduction in mortality was significantly greater for patients without end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than for those with ESRD (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.02). After restricting the cohort to patients ideal for beta-blockers, the relative reduction in mortality provided by beta-blocker therapy was still significantly greater in the non-ESRD group (53% vs. 34%, p = 0.03).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Thirty-day mortality was reduced by the administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors during the hospitalization. The p value for each mortality comparison between patients taking ACE inhibitors and those not receiving them was <0.001. The relative reduction in mortality was significantly greater for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than for those without ESRD (48% vs. 27%, p = 0.02). After restricting the cohort to patients ideal for ACE inhibitors, the relative reduction in mortality provided by ACE inhibitor therapy was still significantly greater in the ESRD group (47% vs. 33%, p = 0.43).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Effects are illustrated for the entire cohort as well as patients deemed ideal for each of the therapies. The mortality models showed good discrimination; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.75 to 0.78 for the 30-day mortality models. In assessing the goodness of fit in both models, there was less than a 10% difference between observed and expected mortality within each decile of probability for each model. The Pearson coefficient was <0.30 between the treatment variables and all other covariates. Triangles = patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD); circles = patients without ESRD. ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ASA = aspirin; BB = beta-blocker.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement