Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:2117-2124, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.024
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Achilli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Serra, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Achilli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Serra, F.

Long-term effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with refractory heart failure and "narrow" QRS

Augusto Achilli, MD*,*, Massimo Sassara, MD*, Sabina Ficili, MD*, Daniele Pontillo, MD*, Paola Achilli, MD*, Claudio Alessi, MD*, Stefano De Spirito, MD*, Roberto Guerra, MD*, Nicolino Patruno, MD{dagger} and Francesco Serra, MD*

* Cardiovascular Department, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy
{dagger} Cardiology Division, S.Giuseppe Hospital, Albano Laziale, Italy



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Baseline duration of QRS (white bars), interventricular delay (black bars), and posterolateral left ventricular wall activation delay (striped bars) in patients in group 1 with sinus rhythm (SR) at enrollment, with prior pacemaker implantation (PM), and in group 2. The only difference between the groups is represented by QRS duration (*p < 0.001 group 2 vs. RS and vs. PM).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Regression lines (solid line = group 1; dashed line = group 2) show a fairly good correlation between the magnitude of interventricular delay decrease ({Delta}IVD) and magnitude of ejection fraction increase ({Delta}EF) (top) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter decrease ({Delta}LVESD) (bottom) in group 1 (open squares) but not in group 2 (solid triangles) after cardiac resynchronization therapy. {Delta} = follow-up – baseline absolute difference. *p value based on analysis of covariance.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement