Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:1909-1916, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.015
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jernberg, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wallentin, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jernberg, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wallentin, L.

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in relation to inflammation, myocardial necrosis, and the effect of an invasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease

Tomas Jernberg, MD, PhD*§,*, Bertil Lindahl, MD, PhD*§, Agneta Siegbahn, MD, PhD{dagger}, Bertil Andren, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Gunnar Frostfeldt, MD, PhD*, Bo Lagerqvist, MD, PhD*, Mats Stridsberg, MD, PhD{dagger}, Per Venge, MD, PhD{dagger} and Lars Wallentin, MD, PhD*§

* Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Center, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
{dagger} Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Chemistry, Cardiothoracic Center, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
{ddagger} Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Cardiothoracic Center, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
§ Uppsala Clinical Research Institute, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden



View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Cumulative probability of death in relation to the level of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and treatment strategy in (A) all patients, (B) patients with interleukin-6 (IL-6) <5 ng/l, and (C) patients with IL-6 ≥5 ng/l. 1) First or second tertile of NT-proBNP plus non-invasive strategy; 2) first or second tertile of NT-proBNP plus invasive strategy; 3) third tertile of NT-proBNP plus non-invasive strategy; 4) third tertile of NT-proBNP plus invasive strategy—whole group: n = 655, 691, 353, and 320; IL-6 <5 ng/l group: n = 520, 540, 190, and 187; IL-6 ≥5 ng/l group: n = 122, 140, 156, and 129, respectively.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Risk of myocardial infarction in relation to the level of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), and treatment strategy. Open columns = non-invasive strategy; solid columns = invasive strategy.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Two-year mortality in relation to level of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), graded left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and treatment strategy. Open columns = first or second tertile of NT-proBNP; solid columns = third tertile of NT-proBNP.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement