Long-term outcome of patients with silent versus symptomatic ischemia six months after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting
Michael J. Zellweger, MD*,*,
Markus Weinbacher, MD*,
Andreas W. Zutter, MD*,
Raban V. Jeger, MD*,
Jan Mueller-Brand, MD ,
Christoph Kaiser, MD*,
Peter T. Buser, MD, FACC* and
Matthias E. Pfisterer, MD, FACC*
* Department of Cardiology, Basel, Switzerland
Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Receiver-operating characteristic curve for the discrimination between silent and symptomatic ischemia. Note that the best discrimination of silent versus symptomatic ischemia was found with a summed difference score (SDS) of 4.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves by summed difference score (SDS) categories. Patients with an SDS of 0 (n = 242) had significantly lower event rates than patients with an SDS of 1 to 4 (n = 49; p = 0.03); these patients had significantly lower event rates than patients with SDS >4 (n = 16; p = 0.005). Note the significant differences in outcome between patients with no, mild, and moderate to severe ischemia, as defined by SDS. MPS = myocardial perfusion SPECT.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves by symptomatic status. Patients without ischemia (n = 242) had significantly lower event rates than patients with silent (n = 44) or symptomatic ischemia (n = 21; p = 0.006 and p < 0.0001, respectively); patients with silent ischemia tended to have lower event rates than patients with symptomatic ischemia (p = 0.12). MPS = myocardial perfusion SPECT.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5 Incremental value of nuclear testing in the evaluation of long-term prognosis. *#Significant increase in global chi-square (*p = 0.001, #p = 0.002). ECG = electrocardiogram; SDS = summed difference score.
|
|
|