Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:33-40, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00557-6
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zellweger, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pfisterer, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zellweger, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pfisterer, M. E.

Long-term outcome of patients with silent versus symptomatic ischemia six months after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting

Michael J. Zellweger, MD*,*, Markus Weinbacher, MD*, Andreas W. Zutter, MD*, Raban V. Jeger, MD*, Jan Mueller-Brand, MD{dagger}, Christoph Kaiser, MD*, Peter T. Buser, MD, FACC* and Matthias E. Pfisterer, MD, FACC*

* Department of Cardiology, Basel, Switzerland
{dagger} Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Flow chart of patients (pts).

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Receiver-operating characteristic curve for the discrimination between silent and symptomatic ischemia. Note that the best discrimination of silent versus symptomatic ischemia was found with a summed difference score (SDS) of 4.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves by summed difference score (SDS) categories. Patients with an SDS of 0 (n = 242) had significantly lower event rates than patients with an SDS of 1 to 4 (n = 49; p = 0.03); these patients had significantly lower event rates than patients with SDS >4 (n = 16; p = 0.005). Note the significant differences in outcome between patients with no, mild, and moderate to severe ischemia, as defined by SDS. MPS = myocardial perfusion SPECT.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves by symptomatic status. Patients without ischemia (n = 242) had significantly lower event rates than patients with silent (n = 44) or symptomatic ischemia (n = 21; p = 0.006 and p < 0.0001, respectively); patients with silent ischemia tended to have lower event rates than patients with symptomatic ischemia (p = 0.12). MPS = myocardial perfusion SPECT.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Incremental value of nuclear testing in the evaluation of long-term prognosis. *#Significant increase in global chi-square (*p = 0.001, #p = 0.002). ECG = electrocardiogram; SDS = summed difference score.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement