Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 42:140-147, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00556-4
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Torre-Amione, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kobrin, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Torre-Amione, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kobrin, I.

Hemodynamic and clinical effects of tezosentan, an intravenous dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure

Guillermo Torre-Amione, MD*,*, James B. Young, MD{dagger}, Wilson S. Colucci, MD{ddagger}, Basil S. Lewis, MD§, Craig Pratt, MD*, Gad Cotter, MD||, Karl Stangl, MD, Uri Elkayam, MD#, John R. Teerlink, MD**, Aline Frey, PharmD{dagger}{dagger}, Maurizio Rainisio, PhD{dagger}{dagger} and Isaac Kobrin, MD{dagger}{dagger}

* Methodist DeBakey Heart Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
{dagger} Section on Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
{ddagger} Cardiovascular Section, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
§ Cardiology Department, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
|| Cardiology Institute, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel
Department of Cardiology, Charite Hospital, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
# Division of Cardiology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
** Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center/University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
{dagger}{dagger} Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Switzerland



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Cardiac index: change from baseline to 6 h after treatment cessation (mean ± SE). Triangles = placebo group (n = 94); open circles = 50 mg/h tezosentan (n = 90); solid circles = 100 mg/h tezosentan (n = 101).

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Change from baseline to hour 6 of infusion in (A) pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), and mean right atrial pressure (RAP) and (B) pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (means, 95% confidence limit [CL]). Confidence limits not crossing zero represent a significant change from baseline at p < 0.05. Dashed lines = placebo; solid lines = tezosentan (T).

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Percent of patients with markedly or moderately improved (scores 1 to 2) or worsened (scores 6 to 8) dyspnea after 24-h infusion.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier plot of time to the combined end point of death or worsening heart failure (HF) during 24-h infusion.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Kaplan-Meier plot of time to death, cardiac failure, pulmonary edema, or cardiogenic shock during treatment and up to 28 days after the end of treatment.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement