Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:1573-1582, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00253-5
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Alter, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Alter, D. A.

Effectiveness of implantable defibrillators for preventing arrhythmic events and death

A Meta-Analysis

Douglas S. Lee, MD, FRCPC*{dagger}{ddagger}, Lawrence D. Green, MD*{dagger}, Peter P. Liu, MD, FRCPC{ddagger}§, Paul Dorian, MD, MSc, FRCPC||, David M. Newman, MD, FACC||, F. Curry Grant, MD, MSc, FRCPC{dagger}, Jack V. Tu, MD, PhD, FRCPC*{dagger} and David A. Alter, MD, PhD, FRCPC{dagger}#,*

* Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation/Clinical Epidemiology, Toronto, Canada
{dagger} Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
{ddagger} Division of Cardiology, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
§ Heart and Stroke/Richard Lewar Centre of Excellence and Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
|| Electrophysiology and Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Canada
# Division of Cardiology, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Science Centre, Toronto, Canada



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 QUOROM flow diagram of search results and the process of identification of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting inclusion criteria. ICD = implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Plot of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the defibrillator intervention (horizontal axis) and control arms (vertical axis) of the included randomized trials. Error bars are the reported standard deviations of LVEF in trial publications. Most of the points lie on the diagonal, suggesting that the trials were balanced for LVEF in the study arms. MADIT I and CABG Patch point estimates overlap. MUSTT and Wever et al. point estimates overlap. No standard deviation of LVEF was reported in MUSTT; only the point estimate is shown. AVID = Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators study; CABG Patch = Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patch Trial; CASH = Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg; CAT = Cardiomyopathy Trial; CIDS = Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study; MADIT = Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial; MUSTT = Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Death from all causes in the primary prevention defibrillator trials, pooled in a random effects model. For each randomized trial, the number of deaths (n) and the number assigned (N) are shown. The rectangles represent the point estimates of the relative risk (RR) for individual studies, and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) are shown as bars. The overall pooled RR is 0.66 with a 95% CI of 0.46 to 0.96, which significantly favors treatment with the defibrillator (p = 0.03). The horizontal tips of the black diamond represent the 95% CI, and the midpoint of the diamond represents the point estimate of the RR. df = degrees of freedom; other abbreviations as in Figure 2.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 All-cause mortality in pooled secondary prevention defibrillator trials. For each randomized trial, the number of deaths (n) and the number assigned (N) are shown. The rectangles represent the point estimates of the relative risk (RR) for individual studies, and the 95% CI are shown as bars. The overall pooled RR is 0.75 with a 95% CI of 0.64 to 0.87, which significantly favors treatment with the defibrillator (p = 0.0002). The study results were not heterogeneous (p = 0.26), and together demonstrated significant reduction in death from any cause with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The horizontal tips of the black diamond represent the 95% CI, and the midpoint of the diamond represents the point estimate of the RR. AVID = Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators study; CASH = Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg; CIDS = Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study; df = degrees of freedom.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Impact of the randomized defibrillator trials on arrhythmic death. For each randomized trial, the number of arrhythmic deaths (n) and the number assigned (N) are shown. All studies showed consistent benefit in reducing arrhythmic death with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and there was no statistical heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.18). Over all studies reporting arrhythmic deaths, the defibrillator reduced the risk of arrhythmic death significantly (pooled relative risk 0.43; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.54). The ICD effect was a highly significant reduction in risk of arrhythmic death (p < 0.00001). The horizontal tips of the black diamond represent the 95% CI, and the midpoint of the diamond represents the point estimate of the RR. CABG Patch = Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patch Trial; MADIT = Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial; MUSTT = Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial. Other abbreviations as in Figure 4.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement