This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Holmvang, L. Articles by Grande, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holmvang, L. Articles by Grande, P.

Quantitative analysis of the admission electrocardiogram identifies patients with unstable coronary artery disease who benefit the most from early invasive treatment

Lene Holmvang, MD^*,*, Peter Clemmensen, MD, PhD^*, Bertil Lindahl, MD, PhD, Bo Lagerqvist, MD, Per Venge, MD, Galen Wagner, MD, Lars Wallentin, MD, PhD, FACC and Peer Grande, MD, PhD^*

^* Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Cardiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA

View larger version (37K): [in a new window]   Figure 1 (A–D) Kaplan-Meier plots of the incidence of death or myocardial infarction at one year, according to the amount of ST-segment deviation (summed deviation in mm) on the admission electrocardiogram (ECG) and the treatment strategy. Continued on next page.

View larger version (31K): [in a new window]   Figure 2 (A–C) Kaplan-Meier plots of the incidence of death or myocardial infarction at one year, according to the amount of ST-segment deviation (number of leads with ST-segment deviation >0.5 mm) on the admission electrocardiogram and the treatment strategy. Continued on next page.

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   Figure 3 Unadjusted relative risk of death or myocardial infarction at one year, according to the amount of ST-segment deviation (summed deviation in mm) on the admission electrocardiogram and the treatment strategy.