The evolving role of direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes
John Eikelboom, MBBS, MSc, FRACP, FRCPA*,*,
Harvey White, MB, ChB, DSc, FRACP, FACC
and
Salim Yusuf, MBBS, Dphil, FRCP (UK), FRCPC, FACC
* Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia and Department of Haematology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
Cardiology Department, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, and Population Health Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Schematic demonstrating the antithrombin activity of heparin compared with direct thrombin inhibitors. Both heparin and direct thrombin inhibitors block circulating thrombin, but only direct thrombin inhibitors block tissue-bound thrombin. Tissue-bound thrombin remains enzymatically active, promoting further platelet and coagulation activation and thrombin generation.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Indirect comparison of the relative efficacy and safety of direct thrombin inhibitors versus heparin with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors versus heparin in trials of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Direct thrombin inhibitor and GP IIb/IIIa data are adapted from references 50 and 53, respectively. CI = confidence interval; DTI = direct thrombin inhibitor; MI = myocardial infarction; OR = odds ratio. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier Science (Lancet 2002:359;294302 and Lancet 2002:359;18998).
|
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.