Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:508-515, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02816-4
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yellon, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yellon, D. M.

Atorvastatin, administered at the onset of reperfusion, and independent oflipid lowering, protects the myocardiumby up-regulating a pro-survival pathway

Robert M. Bell, MBBS, BSc, PhD* and Derek M. Yellon, PhD, DSc, Hon FRCP, FACC*,*

* The Hatter Institute for Cardiovascular Studies, Academic and Clinical Cardiology, Division of Medicine, University College Hospitals and Medical School, University College, London, London, United Kingdom



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Atorvastatin dose–response curve. Incremental concentrations of atorvastatin resulted in a dose-dependent reduction of infarct size, peaking with 50 µmol/l (**p < 0.001 vs. control). Protection with 100 µmol/l was, however, less than that seen at 50 µmol/l (*p < 0.05 vs. control).

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The Akt phosphorylation time-course. Administration of 25 µmol/l atorvastatin to wild-type hearts at the start of reperfusion after a period of ischemia resulted in a robust and rapid increase in Akt phosphorylation (4.1-fold greater than that seen in control hearts, p < 0.001).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The eNOS phosphorylation time-course. Administration of 25 µmol/l atorvastatin at the start of reperfusion after a period of ischemia resulted in a similar pattern of phosphorylation of eNOS to that seen with Akt, with a significant 2.8-fold increase over control (p < 0.001).

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 The PI3K inhibitor, wortmannin, inhibits the reperfusion salvage seen with 25 µmol/l atorvastatin. Wortmannin administered alone had no impact on infarction (*p < 0.05, atorvastatin group vs. control and wortmannin plus atorvastatin).

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Reperfusion salvage seen with 25 µmol/l atorvastatin is absent in eNOS KO mice. Although atorvastatin results in significant protection in the wild-type hearts (WT), this protection was completely absent in the eNOS KO hearts (*p < 0.001 atorvastatin vs. WT control).

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Akt phosphorylation with atorvastatin after 10 min of reperfusion: the effect of wortmannin and the absence of eNOS. Administration of atorvastatin to wild-type and KO hearts resulted in a robust increase in phosphorylation of Akt, although no cardioprotection is seen in eNOS KO hearts (**p < 0.001 vs. control hearts). The administration of the PI3K inhibitor, wortmannin, significantly reduced Akt phosphorylation compared with both control and atorvastatin-treated hearts (§p < 0.01 vs. both control and atorvastatin groups).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement