Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:452-459, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02766-3
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fram, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, G. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fram, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Heller, G. V.

Duration of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging following resolution of acute ischemia: an angioplasty model

Daniel B. Fram, MD, FACC*{dagger},*, Rabih R. Azar, MD*, Alan W. Ahlberg, MA*, Linda D. Gillam, MD, FACC*, Joseph F. Mitchel, DO, FACC*{dagger}, Francis J. Kiernan, MD, FACC*{dagger}, Jeffrey A. Hirst, MD, FACC*{dagger}, Jeffrey F. Mather, MS*, Edward Ficaro, PhD*, Gizelle Cyr, RN*, David Waters, MD, FACC*{dagger} and Gary V. Heller, MD, PhD, FACC*

* Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization, and Echocardiography Laboratories of the Henry Low Heart Center, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
{dagger} University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Nuclear injection protocol (details in the text). PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Decrease over time in the number of abnormal nuclear scans and the intensity of the nuclear defects. *p < 0.001 vs. acute; {dagger}p = 0.01 vs. acute; {ddagger}p < 0.001 vs. all delayed (15 min and 1 to 3 h); ¶p < 0.01 vs. all delayed (15 min and 1 to 3 h); §p = 0.03 vs. 15 min group.

 


View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Myocardial perfusion imaging in a patient who underwent angioplasty of the left anterior descending coronary artery with delayed imaging at 1 h. Acute imaging revealed a marked perfusion defect involving the anterior septum, anterior wall, and apex. Delayed imaging revealed a substantially less intense defect in this distribution and late imaging revealed normal perfusion.

 


View larger version (108K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Myocardial perfusion imaging in a patient who underwent angioplasty of the right coronary artery with delayed imaging at 3 h. Acute imaging revealed a marked perfusion defect involving the inferior wall and the inferior septum. Delayed imaging revealed a substantially less intense defect in this distribution and late imaging revealed normal perfusion.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement