Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:2130-2137, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00482-0
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beyzade, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ye, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beyzade, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ye, S.

Influences of matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene variation on extent of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of myocardial infarction

Seyyare Beyzade, BSc*, Shaoli Zhang, PhD*, Yuk-ki Wong, MD, MRCP{dagger}, Ian N. M. Day, MB, PhD, FRCPath*, Per Eriksson, PhD{ddagger} and Shu Ye, MD, PhD*,*

* Human Genetics Division, Southampton University Medical School, Southampton, United Kingdom
{dagger} Cardiothoracic Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
{ddagger} Atherosclerosis Research Unit, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Schematic presentation of all polymorphisms identified in the matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene.

 


View larger version (56K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Results of electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Two double-stranded oligonucleotide probes corresponding to the T and C alleles, respectively, of the –1986 T>C polymorphism were labeled with 32P and incubated with nuclear extracts from macrophages (U937 [a] and MonoMac-6 [b]), followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. The arrow indicates a DNA–protein complex that is more readily detectable with the T probe (lanes 2 and 5) than the C probe (lanes 4 and 9). The DNA–protein complex is readily competed with unlabeled T probe (lanes 6 and 10), weakly competed with unlabeled C probe (lanes 7 and 11), but not affected by a nonspecific competitor (lanes 8 and 12).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement