Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:2077-2083, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00418-2
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stratton, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Madden, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stratton, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Madden, K.

Effects of aging on cardiovascular responses to parasympathetic withdrawal

John R. Stratton, MD, FACC*,*, Wayne C. Levy, MD, FACC*, James H. Caldwell, MD*, Arnold Jacobson, MD, PhD{dagger}, Janet May, MS*, Dale Matsuoka, CNMT{dagger} and Ken Madden, MD*

* Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
{dagger} Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
{ddagger} VA Puget Sound Healthcare System and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Heart rate (A) and cardiac index (B) (± SEM) in the young (Y) and older (O) groups at rest and following atropine (p < 0.0001 for old vs. young x atropine dose).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The decline in end-diastolic volume index following atropine at similar heart rates (94 ± 2 old vs. 96 ± 2 young, p = ns) and diastolic filling periods (340 ± 13 ms old vs. 349 ± 15 ms young, p = ns) was nearly fivefold greater in the old than in the young (–11.6 ± 1.6 ml/m2 old vs. –2.4 ± 1.6 ml/m2 young, p = 0.04).

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Change in peak early diastolic filling in ml/s/m2 (A) and in end-diastolic volume (EDV)/s (B) in young males (YM) and older males (OM) and young females (YF) and older females (OF) (both p < 0.01 for young vs. old x dose and p < 0.02 for male vs. female x dose).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement