Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003; 41:1823-1830, doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00307-3
© 2003 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masugata, H.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masugata, H.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.

Assessment of right ventricular perfusion after right coronary artery occlusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography

Hisashi Masugata, MD*, Norihiro Fujita, MD*, Isao Kondo, MD*, Barry Peters, MD{dagger}, Koji Ohmori, MD*, Katsufumi Mizushige, MD, FACC*, Masakazu Kohno, MD* and Anthony N. DeMaria, MD, MACC*,{dagger}

* Second Department of Internal Medicine, Kagawa Medical University, Kita-gun, Japan
{dagger} Cardiovascular Division, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA



View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Myocardial contrast echocardiography images at baseline (left) and during coronary occlusion (right). The blue line indicates the region of interest to measure video-intensity in the right ventricular (RV) wall for each image.

 


View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Myocardial contrast echocardiography images at varying pulsing intervals during baseline and right coronary artery occlusion from dogs with mild (top) and severe (bottom) opacification defects.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Plots of video-intensity (y-axis) versus pulsing interval (x-axis) from dogs shown in Figure 2, with mild (left) and severe (right) opacification defects.

 


View larger version (80K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Risk area of the right coronary artery (RCA) delineated by blue dye staining for the slice corresponding to the imaging plane of myocardial contrast echocardiography in the same dogs as in Figures 2 and 3. Regions that were not stained by blue dye between arrows denote the RCA bed.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Changes in right ventricular (RV) wall thickness (A), RV dimension (B), and myocardial contrast echocardiography-derived parameters (C, D, and E) produced by right coronary artery occlusion.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Extent of risk area of an occluded right coronary artery (RCA) delineated by blue dye staining (left), changes in microsphere-derived myocardial blood flow (MBF) in the risk area (middle), and the percent of change in MBF produced by RCA occlusion (right).

 


View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7 Correlation between myocardial contrast echocardiography-derived parameters (x-axis) and microsphere-derived myocardial blood flow (MBF) (y-axis).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement