Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1506-1514
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishio, R.
Right arrow Articles by Matsumori, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishio, R.
Right arrow Articles by Matsumori, A.

Left ventricular pressure-volume relationship in a murine model of congestive heart failure due to acute viral myocarditis

Ryosuke Nishio, MD, PhD*, Shigetake Sasayama, MD, PhD, FACC* and Akira Matsumori, MD, PhD, FACC*,*

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Volume calibration of the conductance catheter. The absolute volume in each cylinder was plotted against the raw signals of conductance acquired by the conductance catheter. The regression formula, (R2 = 0.969; p < 0.01) was used to calculate the raw and parallel volumes.

 


View larger version (48K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Pressure-volume relations, left ventricular (LV) pressure, and slope of derivative of change in systolic pressure over time (dP/dt) curves in control versus infected groups. A, C, E = pressure-volume relations. Light continuous curves are data from the uninfected control group. Continuous curves are data from the infected group. Dotted lines indicate end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure volume relationships. B, D, F = LV pressure and dP/dt curves. A, B = day 1; C, D = day 7; E, F = day 14.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Evolution of contractility, myocardial relaxation, and chamber compliance. Open circles = uninfected control group; solid circles = infected group. dP/dtmax = slope of maximum derivative of change in systolic pressure over time; dP/dtmin = minimum derivative of change in diastolic pressure over time; NL Eed = normalized end-diastolic volume elastance; NL Ees = normalized end-systolic volume elastance. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus control. n = 5 in each measurement.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Evolution of left ventricular pressure and volume. (A) Pressure measurements. Circles = end-systolic pressure (ESP); squares = end-diastolic pressure (EDP). (B) Volume measurements. Solid circles = end-diastolic volume (EDV); squares = end-systolic volume (ESV); open circles = control group; solid circles = infected group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus control. n = 5 in each measurement.

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Evolution of cardiac output, ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular work efficiency. Open circles = uninfected control group; solid circles = infected group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus control. n = 5 in each measurement. CI = cardiac index.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Pathophysiologic manifestations during three phases of acute encephalomyocarditis virus-induced myocarditis.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement