Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1311-1319
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuda, S.
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T. H.

Influence of wall stress and left ventricular geometry on the accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography

Satoshi Yuda, MD, PhD*, Vincent Khoury, MB, BS* and Thomas H. Marwick, MB, BS, PhD, FACC*,*

* University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia



View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The left ventricular (LV) geometric pattern, classified according to relative wall thickness and LV mass index. CH = concentric hypertrophy; CR = concentric remodeling; EH = eccentric hypertrophy; LVMI = left ventricular mass index; N = normal geometry; RWT = relative wall thickness.

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Sensitivity (left), specificity (center), and accuracy (right) of dobutamine stress echocardiography, according to the left ventricular geometric pattern. White bars = normal geometry (N); light gray bars = concentric remodeling (CR); dark gray bars = concentric hypertrophy (CH); black bars = eccentric hypertrophy (EH).

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Sensitivity (left), specificity (center), and accuracy (right) of dobutamine stress echocardiography, according to quartiles of circumferential end-systolic wall stress (cESS) at peak (1st = lowest quartile [<90 kdyne/cm2], 2nd = 2nd lowest quartile [90 to 115 kdyne/cm2], 3rd = 3rd lowest quartile [116 to 144 kdyne/cm2], 4th = highest quartile [≥145 kdyne/cm2]).

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Sensitivity (left), specificity (center), and accuracy (right) of dobutamine stress echocardiography, according to quartiles of meridional end-systolic wall stress (mESS) at peak (1st = lowest quartile [<30 kdyne/cm2], 2nd = 2nd lowest quartile [30 to 38 kdyne/cm2], 3rd = 3rd lowest quartile [39 to 49 kdyne/cm2], 4th = highest quartile [≥50 kdyne/cm2]).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Correlation of left ventricular fractional shortening at peak with circumferential end-systolic wall stress at peak (cESS) (left) and meridional end-systolic wall stress (mESS) at peak (right).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement