Noninvasive pacemaker stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease
A multicenter study
Eugenio Picano, MD, PhD*,*,
Annalisa Alaimo, MD ,
Vlad Chubuchny, MD ,
Edyta Plonska, MD ,
Vittorio Baldo, MD||,
Umberto Baldini, MD**,
Marina Pauletti, MD**,
Roberto Perticucci, MD ,
Lucas Fonseca, MD ,
Hector Ricardo Villarraga, MD ,
Carlo Emanuelli, MD¶,
Gennaro Miracapillo, MD||||,
Enrico Hoffmann, MD* and
Maurizio De Nes, MedTech*
* Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
Cardiology Division, Palermo Hospital, Palermo, Italy
Ukrainian Institute of Cardiology, Kiev, Ukraine
Cardiology Division, Szecyn Hospital, Szecyn, Poland
|| Cardiology Division, Rome, Italy
¶ Cardiology Division, Cremona, Italy
** Cardiology Division, Livorno Hospital, Livorno, Italy
 Cardiology Division, Arezzo Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
 Cardiology Division, Santa Luzia Hospital, Brazilia, Brazil
 Cardiology Division, Fundacion Valle del Lili Cali, Cali, Colombia
|||| Cardiology Unit, Grosseto Hospital, Grosseto, Italy

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 "Standard" and "accelerated" pacing protocols.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Diagnostic value of pacemaker stress echocardiography test. Open bars = new or worsening WMA; solid bars = new, worsening, or fixed WMA. WMA = wall motion abnormalities.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Correlation between wall motion score index (WMSI) at peak pacing stress and angiographically assessed Duke score.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4 Correlation between peak heart rate (HR) and angiographically assessed Duke score.
|
|
|