Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1205-1213
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voci, P.
Right arrow Articles by Romeo, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Voci, P.
Right arrow Articles by Romeo, F.

Coronary recanalization in anterior myocardial infarction

The open perforator hypothesis1

Paolo Voci, MD, PhD*,*, Enrica Mariano, MD*, Francesco Pizzuto, MD*, Paolo Emilio Puddu, MD, FESC, FACC* and Francesco Romeo, MD, FESC, FACC{dagger}

* Section of Cardiology, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
{dagger} Section of Cardiology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy



View larger version (101K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Different levels of recanalization as assessed by high-resolution transthoracic color-Doppler echocardiography after anterior myocardial infarction. (A) Neither the left anterior descending (LAD) nor the perforators are imaged in a patient with failed reperfusion and occluded LAD at angiography. (B) Patent LAD without perforating branches. (C, D) Imaging of perforating branches (non-full-thickness recanalization). (E, F) Full-thickness recanalization.

 


View larger version (138K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Transthoracic Doppler shows a wide variability of diastolic flow velocity, ranging from 15 to 40 cm/s, and flow in opposite direction in a perforating branch (right lower panel). LAD = left anterior descending.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Regression lines show better correlation between recanalization score and wall motion score index and ejection fraction at follow-up, compared with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Regression lines show good correlation between recanalization score and end-diastolic volume index (EDVI) and end-systolic volume index (ESVI) at follow-up, indicating a positive impact on left ventricular remodeling, whereas with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow there was no difference between the regression lines of baseline versus follow-up of EDVI and ESVI.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement