Coronary recanalization in anterior myocardial infarction
The open perforator hypothesis1
Paolo Voci, MD, PhD*,*,
Enrica Mariano, MD*,
Francesco Pizzuto, MD*,
Paolo Emilio Puddu, MD, FESC, FACC* and
Francesco Romeo, MD, FESC, FACC
* Section of Cardiology, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
Section of Cardiology, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy

View larger version (101K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Different levels of recanalization as assessed by high-resolution transthoracic color-Doppler echocardiography after anterior myocardial infarction. (A) Neither the left anterior descending (LAD) nor the perforators are imaged in a patient with failed reperfusion and occluded LAD at angiography. (B) Patent LAD without perforating branches. (C, D) Imaging of perforating branches (non-full-thickness recanalization). (E, F) Full-thickness recanalization.
|
|

View larger version (138K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Transthoracic Doppler shows a wide variability of diastolic flow velocity, ranging from 15 to 40 cm/s, and flow in opposite direction in a perforating branch (right lower panel). LAD = left anterior descending.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Regression lines show better correlation between recanalization score and wall motion score index and ejection fraction at follow-up, compared with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow.
|
|

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4 Regression lines show good correlation between recanalization score and end-diastolic volume index (EDVI) and end-systolic volume index (ESVI) at follow-up, indicating a positive impact on left ventricular remodeling, whereas with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow there was no difference between the regression lines of baseline versus follow-up of EDVI and ESVI.
|
|
|