Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1079-1084
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Main, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Good, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Main, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Good, T. H.

Combined assessment of microvascular integrity and contractile reserve improves differentiation of stunning and necrosis after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction

Michael L. Main, MD, FACC*,*, Anthony Magalski, MD, FACC*, Becky A. Morris, RDCS*, Michael M. Coen, MA*, David G. Skolnick, MD, FACC* and Thomas H. Good, MD, FACC*

* Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA



View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 These myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) images were obtained in a 52-year-old man, two days after he presented with an anterior myocardial infarction. (a) Apical long-axis perfusion image revealing a normally perfused posterior wall (white arrow) and an anteroseptal and apical transmural perfusion defect (yellow arrow). In these power pulse inversion MCE images, the left ventricular (LV) cavity appears yellow, whereas the perfused myocardium appears orange. (b) "Flash" imaging with a high mechanical index (see text for details). (c) The image immediately after "flash" or destruction frames. Note a lack of contrast effect throughout the myocardium, with residual LV cavity opacification. (d) Several cardiac cycles later after microbubble replenishment, perfusion is again noted in the posterior wall, with a perfusion defect in the left anterior descending coronary artery distribution. As predicted by MCE, follow-up echocardiography nearly two months later revealed continued akinesia throughout the infarct zone.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Comparison of mean wall motion scores at follow-up in initially akinetic segments, stratified by the myocardial contrast echocardiography result. Perfused segments demonstrated a significantly lower (better) wall motion score index at follow-up (p < 0.0001). Solid line = perfused segments; dashed line = segments with a perfusion defect.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Comparison of mean wall motion scores at follow-up in initially akinetic segments, stratified by the low-dose dobutamine echocardiography result. Segments with contractile reserve demonstrated a significantly lower (better) wall motion score index at follow-up (p < 0.0001). Solid line = contractile reserve; dashed line = lack of contractile reserve.

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (LDDE), myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), and concordant test results. For each measure of diagnostic utility, MCE performed at least as well as LDDE, with the former having a higher sensitivity. Concordant test results occurred in 74% of segments and, when present, further enhanced the overall accuracy. White bars = LDDE; lined bars = MCE; black bars = concordant test results. NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement