Medical treatment of myocardial ischemia in coronary artery disease: effect of drug regime and irregular dosing in the CAPE II trial
John E. Deanfield, FRCP*,*,
Jean-Marie Detry, MD
,
Philippe Sellier, MD
,
Paul R. Lichtlen, MD
,
Eric Thaulow, MD||,
Jan Bultas, MD¶,
Claudia Brennan, MS#,
Sarah T. Young, PhD#,
Bruce Beckerman, MD# CAPE II Trial Investigators
* Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
Broussais Hospital, Paris, France
Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
|| Childrens and Womens Clinic, Rikshospitalet Oslo, Norway
¶ Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
# Pfizer Inc., New York, New York, USA

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Ambulatory ECG monitoring during phase 2 (monotherapy). Both amlodipine and diltiazem (Adizem XL) reduced ischemic events, but there was a significantly better effect in the amlodipine-treated patients after omission of a single drug dose (see text). *p < 0.002 between amlodipine and diltiazem (Adizem XL) withdrawal.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3 Circadian pattern of transient ischemia during active therapy and after drug withdrawal. Drug monotherapy phase (A) and combination phase (B).
|
|

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4 Angina attacks (A) and nitroglycerin consumption (B) during monotherapy and combination therapy. Both amlodipine and diltiazem (Adizem XL) reduced angina and nitroglycerin consumption (p < 0.0001). Nitroglycerin consumption was significantly lower in patients receiving amlodipine/atenolol. *p = 0.02.
|
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.