Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:826-831
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoshida, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hori, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoshida, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hori, M.

Repeated physiologic stresses provide persistent cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats

Shiro Hoshida, MD, PhD*{dagger},*, Nobushige Yamashita, MD, PhD{dagger}, Kinya Otsu, MD, PhD{dagger} and Masatsugu Hori, MD, PhD{dagger}

* Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan
{dagger} Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Experimental protocol for five repeated-stress groups. After two sessions of exercise, whole-body hyperthermia or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha injections, performed at an interval of 48 h, the rats were subjected to 20 min of left coronary artery occlusion, followed by 48 h of reperfusion. The interval between the second stimulus and ischemia was between 0.5 and 168 h. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation during ischemia and the size of myocardial infarction after reperfusion were then examined. Although not shown, in rats subjected to a single stress (three single-stress groups), the rats were subjected to 20 min of left coronary artery occlusion, followed by 48 h of reperfusion after one episode of exercise, whole-body hyperthermia or TNF-alpha injection. The interval between the single-stress stimulus and ischemia was between 0.5 and 120 h. Myocardial manganese superoxide dismutase activity was measured 0.5 to 120 h after the single-stress stimulus (single-stress group) or 0.5 to 168 h after the second-stress stimulus (repeated-stress group).

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The effects of a single session of a sublethal stimulus and the recovery interval on the size of the myocardial infarct (open bars; mean ± SEM) and the incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) (solid lines; upper panels) and manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD) activity (lower panels) in rat myocardium. Between five and nine rats were included in each group. "C" indicates the values for control rats that did not receive a sublethal stimulus. *p < 0.05 vs. control rats.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The effects of two episodes of sublethal stimuli and the recovery interval on the size of the myocardial infarct (open bars; mean ± SEM) and the incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) (solid lines). Between 7 and 10 rats were included in each group. "S" indicates the values for sham-control rats that did not receive sublethal stimuli. *p < 0.05 vs. sham-control rats. TNF-{alpha} = tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 The effects of two episodes of sublethal stimuli and the recovery interval on manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD) activity in rat myocardium. Five or six rats were included in each group. "S" indicates the values for sham-control rats that did not receive sublethal stimuli. Data are expressed as the mean value ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. sham-control rats.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement