JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:2182-2188
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Wall, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Wall, E. E.

Left ventricular remodeling early after aortic valve replacement: differential effects on diastolic function in aortic valve stenosis and aortic regurgitation

Hildo J. Lamb, PhD*,*,1, Hugo P. Beyerbacht, MD{dagger}, Albert de Roos, MD*, Arnoud van der Laarse, PhD{dagger}, Hubert W. Vliegen, MD{dagger}, Ferre Leujes, MD{dagger}, Jeroen J. Bax, MD{dagger} and Ernst E. van der Wall, MD{dagger}

* Radiology, Leiden, The Netherlands
{dagger} Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The left ventricular mass index (LVMI)/left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) of 12 patients with aortic valve stenosis and 7 patients with aortic regurgitation, before (PRE) and after (POST) valve replacement, compared with 10 control subjects. Mean values are displayed with standard deviation bars. *p < 0.05 versus control subjects; {dagger}p < 0.05 before surgery versus after surgery (paired two-tailed t test); {ddagger}p < 0.05 aortic stenosis versus aortic regurgitation (pre vs. pre or post vs. post).

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) The maximum acceleration slope of early diastolic filling corrected for cardiac output (E accel peak/CO), and (B) the maximum deceleration slope of early diastolic filling corrected for cardiac output (E decel peak/CO) of 12 patients with aortic valve stenosis and 7 patients with aortic regurgitation, before (PRE) valve replacement and 9 ± 3 months after (POST) valve replacement, compared with 10 control subjects. The mean values are displayed with standard deviation bars. *p < 0.05 versus control subjects; {dagger}p < 0.05 before surgery versus after surgery (paired two-tailed t test); {ddagger}p < 0.05 aortic stenosis versus aortic regurgitation (pre vs. pre or post vs. post).

 





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.