Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 40:1856-1863
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scharhag, J.u.
Right arrow Articles by Kindermann, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scharhag, J.u.
Right arrow Articles by Kindermann, W.

Athlete’s heart

Right and left ventricular mass and function in male endurance athletes and untrained individuals determined by magnetic resonance imaging

J.ürgen Scharhag, MD*,*, G.ünther Schneider, MD{dagger}, Axel Urhausen, MD*, Veneta Rochette*, Bernhard Kramann, MD{dagger} and Wilfried Kindermann, MD*

* Institute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, Saarbrücken, Germany
{dagger} Clinic of Radiology, Department of Radiodiagnostics, University of Saarland, Saarbrücken, Germany



View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 End-diastolic T1-weighted short-axis slice from an endurance athlete (left) and an untrained control subject (right). Compared with the heart of the control subject, the endurance athlete’s heart is characterized by an enlarged volume and a greater myocardial mass of both ventricles, while the proportions of the left and right heart are the same as in the untrained control subject.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Myocardial mass, myocardial mass index (myocardial mass divided by body surface area) and ratio of left ventricular (LV) to right ventricular (RV) mass (ratio LVM/RVM) in endurance athletes (A) and untrained control subjects (C). Data are expressed as the mean value ± SD. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. ***p < 0.001 (paired t test).

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlation of left ventricular mass (LVM) and right ventricular mass (RVM) to maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max).

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 End-diastolic volume, end-diastolic volume index (end-diastolic volume divided by body surface area) and ratio of left ventricular (LV) to right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume (EDV) (ratio LV-EDV/RV-EDV) in endurance athletes (A) and untrained control subjects (C). Data are expressed as the mean value ± SD. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. ***p < 0.001 (paired t test).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Stroke volume, ejection fraction (EF), ratio of left ventricular (LV) to right ventricular (RV) stroke volume (ratio stroke volume LV/RV), and ratio of LV-EF to RV-EF (ratio EF LV/RV) in endurance athletes (A) and untrained control subjects (C). Data are expressed as the mean value ± SD. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 (paired t test).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement