Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:1546-1554
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lafitte, S. t.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lafitte, S. t.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaria, A. N.

Contrast echocardiography can assess risk area and infarct size during coronary occlusion and reperfusion: experimental validation

S. téphane Lafitte, MD*, Aya Higashiyama, MD*, Hisashi Masugata, MD*, Barry Peters, MD*, Monet Strachan, RDCS*, O. i Ling Kwan, RDCS* and Anthony N. DeMaria, MD, FACC*,*

* Cardiovascular Division, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA



View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Diagram summarizing FLASH and LATE sequence protocol performed during occlusion and reperfusion. MCE = myocardial contract echocardiography.

 


View larger version (62K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Representative myocardial contrast echocardiography images and tissue sample delineating risk area and infarct size during occlusion (top) and reperfusion (middle). With occlusion, opacification defect was unchanged throughout FLASH and related best to risk area (RA), but smaller in LATE phase and related best to infarct area (IA). With reperfusion, BEGIN FLASH was larger and related best to RA, whereas END FLASH was similar to LATE images and best reflected IA.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Correlations between risk area (RA) and infarct area (IA) sizes obtained by postmortem dye methods and FLASH sequence defects (beginning of the sequence, BEGIN) on the top panel and LATE sequence defects (LATE) during occlusion: RA is most closely correlated with BEGIN defect and IA most closely with LATE defect.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Correlations between size of the infarct area (IA) and myocardial contrast echography (MCE) parameters from flash and late sequence.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Correlations between risk area (RA) and infarct area (IA) sizes obtained by postmortem dye methods and FLASH sequence defects (beginning of the sequence, BEGIN, and end of the sequence, END, respectively) at four time points of reperfusion. MCE = myocardial contrast echocardiography.

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Variations of a and b parameters during each protocol phase: b = baseline, o = occlusion, r30, r60, r120, r180 = reperfusion 30, 60, 120 and 180 min. the evolution of the parameters differs for two subgroups defined by their infarct area sizes (*p < 0.01 for comparison for each group between basal and occlusion/reperfusion stages). MCE = myocardial contrast echocardiography.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement