cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:1538-1545
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jugdutt, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Idikio, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jugdutt, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Idikio, H.

Vascular remodeling during healing after myocardial infarction in the dog model

Effects of reperfusion, amlodipine and enalapril

Bodh I. Jugdutt, MD, FACC*,*, Vijayan Menon, BSc*, Dinender Kumar, PhD* and Halliday Idikio, MD{dagger}

* Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
{dagger} Department of Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Diagram showing the method used for tissue sampling. LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX = left circumflex coronary artery; LV = left ventricular.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Effect of treatments on CVF (A, B), PVF (C,D) and the media/lumen ratio and media thickness (E,F). Data on vessels with areas 5 to 20 x 104 µm2 are shown and pooled for hearts with or without reperfusion (E,F).

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Power function plots of the media/lumen ratio versus blood vessel area. Data were pooled for hearts with or without reperfusion. Note the cluster of points at the lower area range (<20 x 104 µm2). Regression coefficients (r) were 0.83 for the sham group, 0.59 for the placebo, 0.75 for the amlodipine group and 0.33 for the enalapril group.

 


View larger version (144K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Typical photomicrographs of noninfarct tissue six weeks after myocardial infarction. Picrosirius-red staining shows collagen as red, and myocytes and other structures as yellow. A2, B2 = polarized light showing collagen as bright yellow or green; A1, A2 = placebo effect; B1, B2 = effect of amlodipine, showing a resistance vessel with an increased area of media, relative to the lumen, and perivascular fibrosis. Arrows indicate vessels. Crystalline material from postmortem arteriograms are seen within the lumen.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Diagram showing changes in the resistance vessel lumen (inner circle) and wall (area between inner and outer circles). The dark area represents perivascular fibrosis. The wall/lumen ratio is nearly similar for enalapril and amlodipine, although the wall area is less with enalapril and greater with amlodipine, compared with placebo.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home