cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:1503-1507
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crispell, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hershberger, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crispell, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hershberger, R. E.

Periodic rescreening is indicated for family members at risk of developing familial dilated cardiomyopathy

Kathy A. Crispell, MDFACC*, Emily L. Hanson, MS*, Kelly Coates, BS*, Warren Toy, BS* and Ray E. Hershberger, MD, FACC*,*

* Department of Medicine/Cardiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA



View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Pedigree including subjects with the affected phenotype and their first-degree relatives. Squares = males; circles = females; fully filled symbols = affected status at baseline screening; half-filled symbols = a change to affected status based on follow-up screening, 2000 to 2001; N = unaffected status; ? = unknown status; blank symbol = that the subject was not screened.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home