HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, H. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Anderson, H. V.

A contemporary overview of percutaneous coronary interventions

The American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC–NCDR)

^* Texas Heart Institute and the University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA

View larger version (18K): [in a new window]   Figure 1 Variation in proportion of procedures without class I indications for percutaneous coronary intervention for 139 institutions participating in American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Data are arranged from lowest to highest proportion. The dashed line represents overall average of 5%.

View larger version (18K): [in a new window]   Figure 2 Variation in proportion of procedures in which coronary stents were placed for 139 institutions participating in American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Data are arranged from lowest to highest proportion. The dashed line represents overall average of 77% of procedures.

View larger version (27K): [in a new window]   Figure 3 Variations in mortality for 139 institutions participating in American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry, arranged from lowest to highest for each group: (A) females; (B) patients with multivessel disease; (C) diabetics. The dashed lines on each graph represent overall average for the group (see text for details).