Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:530-537
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, N. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S.

Myocardial and microcirculatory kinetics of BR14, a novel third-generation intravenous ultrasound contrast agent

Nicholas G. Fisher, MBBS*, Jonathan P. Christiansen, MB, ChB*, Howard Leong-Poi, MD*, Ananda R. Jayaweera, PhD*, Jonathan R. Lindner, MD* and Sanjiv Kaul, MD*,*

* Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA



View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Changes in acoustic intensity (AI) values from the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) beds (denoted on the images) after the injection of BR14 during maximal hyperemia. The LAD had a non-critical stenosis, whereas the LCx bed was normal. Although a flow mismatch is seen early after injection, the AI in both beds is similar at a later point in time, indicating redistribution. See text for details.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Location and average numbers of stationary microbubbles per 20 high power optical fields (OF) over time. See text for details.

 


View larger version (123K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Example of retained microbubbles within the capillaries under fluorescent epi-illumination. Microbubble (A) on the left of the picture remains static throughout the imaging sequence. A second microbubble (B) can be seen to stop in an adjacent capillary, remains virtually static for 4 s and then dislodges.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 A graphic representation of the temporal course of transient retention (arrival and departure times) of individual microbubbles in capillaries at x20 magnification. It can be seen that the microbubbles responsible for the acoustic signal at any given time are different.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 A mixing chamber model for the coronary circulation illustrating the input and output functions of a venous bolus injection of a second-generation contrast agent that is not retained within the myocardium. The input function resembles a Gaussian function, whereas the output function resembles a lagged normal density function. See text for details.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
figure 6 Time-versus-acoustic intensity plots of br14 from the left anterior descending coronary artery (lad) and left circumflex coronary artery beds in the presence of non-critical lad stenosis during hyperemia. the proposed model fits the plots from both the beds. see text for details. abbreviations as in figure 1.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement