cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:1723-1728
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Boer, M.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Boer, M.-J.

Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

A randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy

Menko-Jan de Boer, MD*,*, Jan-Paul Ottervanger, MD*, Arnoud W. J. van’t Hof, MD*, Jan C. A. Hoorntje, MD*, Harry Suryapranata, MD*, Felix Zijlstra, MD* the Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group

* Department of Cardiology, Isala Clinics location "de Weezenlanden," Zwolle, Netherlands



View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The Kaplan-Meier curve compares the overall survival for patients randomized for angioplasty treatment (solid line) and thrombolysis treatment (dashed line) during 24 ± 6 months of follow-up (p = 0.04, relative risk: 2.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 6.2).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The Kaplan-Meier curve compares the overall survival free of recurrent infarction or stroke for patients randomized for angioplasty treatment (solid line) and thrombolysis treatment (dashed line) during 24 ± 6 months of follow-up (p = 0.003, relative risk: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.4 to 7.0).

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home