cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:1588-1593
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aaberge, L.
Right arrow Articles by Forfang, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aaberge, L.
Right arrow Articles by Forfang, K.

Continued symptomatic improvement three to five years after transmyocardial revascularization with co2 laser

A late clinical follow-up of the norwegian randomized trial with transmyocardial revascularization

Lars Aaberge, MD*,*, Kjell Rootwelt, MD, PhD{dagger}, Svein Blomhoff, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Kjell Saatvedt, MD, PhD§, Michel Abdelnoor, MPH, PhD|| and Kolbjorn Forfang, MD, PhD*

* Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
{dagger} Department of Clinical Chemistry/Section of Nuclear Medicine, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
{ddagger} Department of Psychiatry, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
§ Feiringklinikken, Feiring, Oslo, Norway
|| Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after transmyocardial revascularization with CO2 laser compared with medical treatment. Left ventricular ejection fraction in 63 of 75 patients (84%) with complete multiple-gated acquisition investigations during follow-up; LVEF values are given as mean ± SD. No statistically significant difference between the groups during follow-up. Black bar = TMR (n = 33); lined bar = medical treatment (n = 30).

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Quality of life (MOS 36 Short-Form Health Survey) during 12 months’ follow-up. Summary physical component scale (PCS) and summary mental component scale (MCS) in the medical treatment (MT) group and transmyocardial revascularization with CO2 laser (TMR) group during 12 months follow-up. Higher values indicate improved quality of life. *Statistical significance between groups, comparing the changes between the groups from baseline to 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Summary physical component scales (PCS) in patients with different angina classifications. Higher values indicate improved quality of life. Values are given as mean ± SD. *Statistical significance between patients classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II and class III and between NYHA functional class III and class IV. Lined bar = all; shaded bar = transmyocardial revascularization with CO2 laser; black bar = medical treatment. *p < 0.01.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home