Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:9-14
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Topol, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhatt, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Topol, E. J.

Meta-analysis of randomized and registry comparisons of ticlopidine with clopidogrel after stenting

Deepak L. Bhatt, MD*, Michel E. Bertrand, MD, FACC{dagger}, Peter B. Berger, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Philippe L. L’Allier, MD§, Issam Moussa, MD, FACC||, Jeffrey W. Moses, MD, FACC||, George Dangas, MD, PhD, FACC||, Megumi Taniuchi, MD, FACC, John M. Lasala, MD, FACC, David R. Holmes, MD, FACC{ddagger}, Stephen G. Ellis, MD, FACC* and Eric J. Topol, MD, FACC*,*

* Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
{dagger} Hopital Cardiologique, Lille, France
{ddagger} Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
§ Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Canada
|| Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, New York, New York, USA
Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 The odds ratio (OR) plots with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) for each of the trials individually, as well as for the pooled data. Estimates to the left of the centerline reflect that clopidogrel was more effective; those to the right of the centerline indicate that ticlopidine was more effective. The size of the boxes corresponds to the number of patients in the trial. Arrows indicate that the limits of the CI extend beyond the graph. CCF = Cleveland Clinic Foundation; CLASSICS = CLopidogrel ASpirin Stent International Cooperative Study; TOPPS = Ticlid Or Plavix Post-Stent.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The odds ratio (OR) plots with 95% confidence interval (CIs) for the rate of 30-day mortality. The boxes for the CLopidogrel ASpirin Stent International Cooperative Study (CLASSICS) and North Memorial studies reflect directionality and sample size, but true ORs cannot be determined, because both trials had an arm with a point estimate of zero. Arrows indicate that the limits of the CI extend beyond the graph. CCF = Cleveland Clinic Foundation; TOPPS = Ticlid Or Plavix Post-Stent.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The odds ratio plots with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the rates of the individual components of the composite end point. MACE = major adverse cardiac events; MI = myocardial infarction; SAT = subacute stent thrombosis; TVR = target vessel revascularization.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement