cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39:70-78
© 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v39,p746)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson Tang, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson Tang, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, M. B.

Neurohormonal and clinical responses to high- versus low-dose enalapril therapy in chronic heart failure

W. H. Wilson Tang, MD*, Randall H. Vagelos, MD*, Yin-Gail Yee, BS*, Claude R. Benedict, MD{dagger}, Kathy Willson, RN*, Charles L. Liss, MS{ddagger}, Patrice LaBelle, MD{ddagger} and Michael B. Fowler, MBBS, FRCP, FACC*,*

* Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, California, USA
{dagger} University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
{ddagger} Merck & Co., West Point, Pennsylvania, USA



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Study protocol and withdrawal. Data are expressed as the number of patients withdrawn/discontinued from the trial. HD = high-dose; LD = low-dose; qd = once daily; bid = twice daily; peak VO2 = peak oxygen consumption.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity after high-dose versus low-dose enalapril therapy. Only statistically significant results are reported from the comparisons: 1) between groups; 2) within a group (baseline to end of study); and 3) within a group (pre-dose to post-dose). In the first two comparisons, the p value represents both pre- and post-dose results, unless otherwise stated. *p < 0.05 pre-dose versus post-dose. Open bars = pre-dose ACE activity; solid bars = post-dose ACE activity.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Plasma angiotensin II (AT-II) levels after high-dose versus low-dose enalapril therapy. Only statistically significant results are reported from the comparisons: 1) between groups; 2) within a group (baseline to end of study); and 3) within a group (pre-dose to post-dose). *p < 0.05 pre-dose versus post-dose. Open bars = pre-dose AT-II level; solid bars = post-dose AT-II level.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Serum aldosterone levels after high-dose versus low-dose enalapril therapy. Only statistically significant results are reported from the comparisons: 1) between groups; 2) within a group (baseline to end of study); and 3) within a group (pre-dose to post-dose). *p < 0.05 pre-dose versus post-dose. Open bars = pre-dose aldosterone level; solid bars = post-dose aldosterone level.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Plasma renin activity (PRA) after high-dose versus low-dose enalapril therapy. Only statistically significant results are reported from the comparisons: 1) between groups; 2) within a group (baseline to end of study); and 3) within a group (pre-dose to post-dose). *p < 0.05 pre-dose versus post-dose. Open bars = pre-dose PRA level; solid bars = post-dose PRA level.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6 Post-dose serum aldosterone escape and plasma AT-II reactivation after high-dose versus low-dose enalapril therapy at the end of the study (week 34).

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home