cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:1916-1922
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kodama, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kodama, K.

The healing process of infarct-related plaques

Insights from 18 months of serial angioscopic follow-up

Yasunori Ueda, MD, PhDa,*, Masanori Asakura, MDb, Osamu Yamaguchi, MDb, Atsushi Hirayama, MD, PhDa, Masatsugu Hori, MD, PhD, FACCb and Kazuhisa Kodama, MD, PhD, FACCa

a Cardiovascular Division, Osaka Police Hospital, OsakaJapan
b Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Color samples for the grading of yellow plaque.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Prevalence of yellow plaque at the culprit lesions (A), mean (±SD) color grade of the culprit plaque (B) and prevalence of thrombus at the culprit plaques (C). Yellow plaques remained for as long as 18 months at the culprit lesions of acute MI, although the color grade was reduced significantly and the prevalence was reduced mildly but significantly from one to six months after reperfusion. The prevalence of thrombus was decreased significantly from immediately to one month after reperfusion, and further from one to six months. 0M = immediately after reperfusion; M = month(s) after reperfusion. A: *p < 0.05 vs. 1 M. B: *p < 0.005 vs. 1 M. C: *p < 0.005 vs. 0 M. {dagger}p < 0.005 vs. 1 M.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Prevalence of thrombus (A) and mean (±SD) color grade (B) in patients with HL (solid bars) and patients without HL (hatched bars). The prevalence of thrombus and the mean color grade immediately after reperfusion and at one month were not different between the patients with HL and those without HL. The mean color grade at six months was significantly higher in the patients with HL. 0 M = immediately after reperfusion; M = months after reperfusion. *p < 0.05 vs. patients without HL.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Prevalence of thrombus (A) and mean (±SD) color grade (B) in patients with DM (solid bars) and patients without DM (hatched bars). The prevalence of thrombus and the mean color grade immediately after reperfusion were not different between the patients with HL and those without HL. The prevalence of thrombus was significantly higher and the mean color grade tended (p = 0.08) to be higher in the patients with DM at one month. The mean color grade at six months was not different between the patients with DM and those without DM. 0 M = immediately after reperfusion; M = months after reperfusion. *p < 0.05 vs. patients without DM.

 




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home