Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:1902-1911
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, M.

Utility of current risk stratification tests for predicting major arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction

James J. Bailey, MD, MSc*,*, Alan S. Berson, PHD{dagger}, Harry Handelsman, DO{ddagger} and Morrison Hodges, MD, FACC§

* Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MarylandUSA
{dagger} Bioengineering Scientific Research Group, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MarylandUSA
{ddagger} Center for Practice and Technology Assessment, Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, Bethesda, MarylandUSA
§ Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MinnesotaUSA



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the five tests evaluated in the study. The curves were generated using the approach of Moses et al. (17). AECG = ambulatory electrocardiography; ECG = electrocardiogram.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement