Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:1668-1674
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levenson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levenson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, A.

Gender differences in wall shear–mediated brachial artery vasoconstriction and vasodilation

Jaime Levenson, MD*,a, Franco Pessana, E. ENG{dagger}, Jerome Gariepy, MDa, Ricardo Armentano, PhD{dagger} and Alain Simon, MDa

a Centre de Médecine Préventive Cardiovasculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Hôpital Broussais, Paris, France
{dagger} Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Representative tracings of brachial artery velocity profiles for one subject assessed by Doppler multigated velocimetry at baseline (left), during forearm occlusion at 180 s (center) and after 20 s of reactive hyperemia (right). Bold lines represent the mean value of at least 200 velocity profiles at each condition.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (Left) Measured diameter obtained by Doppler multigated velocimetry, as compared with true tube values. (Right) Difference in mean value between the measured diameter obtained by Doppler multigated velocimetry and the actual tube diameter value.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Time course of the entire duration of brachial wall shear rate and diameter measurements at baseline and during occlusion and reactive hyperemia in men and women.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 (Left bars) Changes in brachial diameter during arterial occlusion at 3 min, normalized for changes in wall shear rate at the same time. (Right bars) Changes in diameter after 1-min release of arterial occlusion, normalized for the maximal changes in wall shear at 20 s. {dagger}p < 0.01.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5 Scatterplot showing regression lines between brachial artery diameter and shear rate changes during the entire time course of the study (see Fig. 3). Each point for women and men corresponds to the mean percent change from baseline of the 5 measurements obtained during occlusion and the 10 measurements obtained after release of the occlusion. Solid circles represent men: y = 0.0734 x –3.964, r = 0.79, p < 0.01; open circles represent women: y = 0.1842 x +0.3064, r = 0.81, p < 0.01. Slope difference: p < 0.01. Note that the maximal increase in shear in men (282 ± 62%) and women (131 ± 28%) at 20 s is reached before the maximal increase in diameter. The exclusion of these points did not affect the significance of the regression.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement