Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:464-471
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheiban, I.
Right arrow Articles by Trevi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheiban, I.
Right arrow Articles by Trevi, G.

Time course and determinants of left ventricular function recovery after primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Imad Sheiban, MD*, Gabriele Fragasso, MD{dagger}, Giuseppe M. C. Rosano, MD{ddagger}, Aniruddha Dharmadhikari, MD{dagger}, Vaios Tzifos, MD{dagger}, Paolo Pagnotta, MD{dagger}, Sergio L. Chierchia, MD, FESC, FACC{dagger} and Gianpaolo Trevi, MD*

* Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
{dagger} Department of Cardiology, Istituto Scientifico/Università San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
{ddagger} Cardiovascular Research Unit, San Raffaele–Roma, Tosinvest Sanita’, Roma, Italy



View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Peak and time to peak creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB levels in the three study groups after reperfusion. *p < 0.001.

 


View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Changes in left ventricular diastolic and systolic volumes in all study groups during the follow-up period.

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in all study groups during the follow-up period.

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Changes in wall motion score index in all study groups during the follow-up period. *p < 0.01; **p < 0.001.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement