Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:344-351
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wyse, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wyse, D. G.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the Multicenter UnSustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT): drug testing and as-treated analysis

D. George Wyse, MD, PhD, FACC*, Mario Talajic, MD, FACC{dagger}, Gail E. Hafley, MS{ddagger}, Alfred E. Buxton, MD, FACC§, L. Brent Mitchell, MD||, Teresa K. Kus, MD, PhD, FACC||, Douglas L. Packer, MD, FACC, William H. Kou, MD, FACC#, Robert Lemery, MD, FACC**, Peter Santucci, MD{dagger}{dagger}, Denise Grimes, RN{ddagger}{ddagger}, Kathleen Hickey, RN§§, Carolyn Stevens, RN, Steven N. Singh, MD, FACC|| for the MUSTT Investigators

* University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
{dagger} Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
{ddagger} Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
§ Temple University Hospital School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
|| Sacre Coeur Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Mayo Clinic Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
# Veteran’s Administration Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
** Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
{dagger}{dagger} Rush-Presbyterian Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
{ddagger}{ddagger} Thoracic and Cardiovascular Institute, Lansing, Michigan, USA
§§ Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
|| Veteran’s Administration Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA



View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Survival with effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy ([ADT] heavy line) versus no antiarrhythmic therapy ([AT] light line), overall (A) and among patients with noninducible versus stable, inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) (B).

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Arrhythmia-free survival with effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy ([ADT] heavy line) versus no antiarrhythmic therapy ([AT] light line), overall (A) and among patients with noninducible versus stable inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) (B).

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Survival in patients receiving effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy found at drug trial 1 (solid line) versus trial 2 or later drug trials (broken line).

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4 Survival with effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy (heavy line) versus no antiarrhythmic therapy ([AT] light line) by agent used: class 1A and other antiarrhythmic agents (A), sotalol (B), propafenone (C) and amiodarone (D).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement