Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38:219-226
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Erbel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruch, C.
Right arrow Articles by Erbel, R.

Changes in QRS voltage in cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion: reversibility after pericardiocentesis and after anti-inflammatory drug treatment

Christian Bruch, MDa, Axel Schmermund, MDa, Nikolaos Dagres, MDa, Thomas Bartel, MDa, Guido Caspari, MDa, Stephan Sack, MDa and Raimund Erbel, MD, FACCa

a Department of Cardiology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 (A) Maximum QRS amplitude in the limb leads in group A patients, who where treated with pericardiocentesis. AP = immediately after pericardiocentesis; BP = before pericardiocentesis; d3 = three days after pericardiocentesis; d6 = six days after pericardiocentesis. (B) Maximum QRS amplitude in the limb leads in group B patients, who were treated with anti-inflammatory medication. BT = before anti-inflammatory treatment; d6 = six days after initiation of anti-inflammatory medication. (C) Maximum QRS amplitude in the limb leads in group C patients (pericarditis). d0 = baseline measurement; d7 = after a seven-day follow-up.

 



View larger version (204K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 (A) Simultaneous echocardiography (left side of the panel, apical four-chamber view) and electrocardiogram recordings (right side of the panel) in a 64-year-old man who developed significant pericardial effusion (PE) with signs of cardiac tamponade three weeks after mitral valve replacement. Note the reduction of the QRS amplitude in the limb leads and concomitant nonspecific T wave abnormalities. (B) Same patient as in (A) after successful pericardiocentesis with removal of 600 ml of pericardial fluid. Note the even lower QRS voltage in the limb leads than before pericardiocentesis and the persistence of nonspecific T wave abnormalities. (C) Same patient six days after pericardiocentesis. The echocardiogram shows no evidence of recurrent effusion. QRS amplitude in the limb leads significantly increased. LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle.

 


View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 (A) A 23-year-old man with acute lymphatic leukemia who was treated with prednisolone due to recurrent malignant pericardial effusion. Note low QRS voltage in the limb leads before initiation of medical treatment. (B) Same patient as in (A) six days after initiation of anti-inflammatory treatment. Note the change of the QRS axis and the significant increase of maximum QRS amplitude in the limb leads. LV = left ventricle; RV = right ventricle.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement