Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after pacing: the Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing
Allan C. Skanes, MD*,
Andrew D. Krahn, MD, FACC*,
Raymond Yee, MD, FACC*,
George J. Klein, MD, FACC*,
Stuart J. Connolly, MD, FACCc,
Charles R. Kerr, MD, FACC ,
Michael Gent, DSc ,
Kevin E. Thorpe, MMath ,
Robin S. Roberts, MTech for the CTOPP Investigators
* Arrhythmia Service, Division of Cardiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
c The Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Cumulative risk of the development of chronic atrial fibrillation over time for the groups receiving ventricular (V) and physiologic (P) pacing. The curves diverge between 6 and 12 months and continue to diverge over time.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Distribution of treatment effect of physiologic pacing by subgroup. The hazard ratios (solid circle) and the 95% confidence intervals are plotted for the treatment effect of physiologic pacing. Associated p values are shown. See text for details. Afib = atrial fibrillation; Hypten = hypertension; LVF = left ventricular function; MICAD = myocardial infarction or coronary artery disease; SA = sinoatrial.
|
|
|