Long-term mortality benefit with abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Keaven M. Anderson, PhD*,
Robert M. Califf, MD, FACC
,
Gregg W. Stone, MD, FACC**,
Franz-Josef Neumann, MD, FACC||,
Gilles Montalescot, MD¶,
Dave P. Miller, MS
,
James J. Ferguson, III, MD, FACC
,
James T. Willerson, MD, FACC
,
Harlan F. Weisman, MD, FACC* and
Eric J. Topol, MD, FACC
* Centocor, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA
Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
Lewin-TAG, Inc., San Francisco, California, USA
|| Deutsches Herzzentrum, Munich, Germany
¶ Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
** Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1 Mortality over six months for all studies combined by patient randomization to standard therapy (placebo) versus standard therapy plus abciximab bolus within 1 h before percutaneous coronary intervention followed by a 12-h infusion.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2 Difference in one-year mortality in the EPIC, EPILOG and EPISTENT trials by randomized treatment assignment partitioned among patients with and without an early end point event (death, myocardial infarction or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting within 48 h of of randomization). Solid box = with event < 48 h; open box = without event < 48 h. For acronym definitions, see Abbreviations and Acronyms box.
|
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.