Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:1936-1942
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tabata, T.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tabata, T.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, A. L.

Difference in the respiratory variation between pulmonary venous and mitral inflow doppler velocities in patients with constrictive pericarditis with and without atrial fibrillation

Tomotsugu Tabata, MD, PhDa, Samer S. Kabbani, MDa, R. Daniel Murray, PhDa, James D. Thomas, MD, FACCa, Ibrahim Abdalla, MDa and Allan L. Klein, MD, FACCa

a Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA



View larger version (50K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Respiratory variation in pulsed Doppler MV and PV velocities in patients with constrictive pericarditis and sinus rhythm. The MV-E velocity decreased from Exp to Insp. The MV-A velocity slightly decreased from Exp to Insp. Both of the PV-S and D velocities dramatically decreased from Exp to Insp. A = mitral inflow late filling wave; D = pulmonary venous diastolic wave; E = mitral inflow early filling wave; Exp = expiration; Insp = inspiration; MV = mitral inflow; PV = pulmonary venous flow; S = pulmonary venous systolic wave.

 


View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 The beat-to-beat change in pulsed Doppler MV and PV velocities in patients with atrial fibrillation without constrictive pericarditis. In the subjects with atrial fibrillation without constrictive pericarditis, early diastolic MV and PV velocities become greater with long filling intervals as shown by white arrows regardless of the phase of respiration. D = pulmonary venous diastolic wave; E = mitral inflow early filling wave; Exp = expiration; Insp = inspiration; MV = mitral inflow; PV = pulmonary venous; S = pulmonary venous systolic wave.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Respiratory variation in pulsed Doppler MV and PV velocities in patients with constrictive pericarditis and atrial fibrillation. A decrease in the MV-E and PV-D velocities during a long filling interval immediately after the onset of inspiration was observed as shown by the thinner arrows. In contrast, there was an increase in those velocities during short filling interval at the onset of expiration as shown by a thick arrow. D = pulmonary venous diastolic wave; E = mitral inflow early filling wave; Exp = expiration; Insp = inspiration; MV = mitral inflow; PV = pulmonary venous; S = pulmonary venous systolic wave.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement