Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:1259-1265
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scrutinio, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scrutinio, D.

Ticlopidine versus aspirin after myocardial infarction (stami) trial

Domenico Scrutinio, MD*, Claudio Cimminiello, MD{dagger}, Ettore Marubini, PhD{ddagger}, Maria Vittoria Pitzalis, MD§, Matteo Di Biase, MD||, Paolo Rizzon, MD§ the STAMI Group

* Division of Cardiology, "S. Maugeri" Foundation, IRCCS, Institute of Rehabilitation, Cassano Murge, Bari, Italy
{dagger} Medical Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Vimercate Hospital, Milan, Italy
{ddagger} Institute of Medical Statistics and Biometry, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
§ Institute of Cardiology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
|| Division of Cardiology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. This study was supported by a grant from Sanofi-Synthelabo, Milan, Italy



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Incidence curves for primary end point.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Crude cumulative incidence curves for death (A), nonfatal repeat myocardial infarction (B) and angina or nonfatal stroke (C).

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement