Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:1214-1220
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjøller-Hansen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Grande, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kjøller-Hansen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Grande, P.

Beneficial effects of ramipril on left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes after uncomplicated invasive revascularization are associated with a reduction in cardiac events in patients with moderately impaired left ventricular function and no clinical heart failure

Lars Kjøller-Hansen, MDa, Rolf Steffensen, MDa and Peer Grande, MD, PhDa

a Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Mean change from baseline (with 95% confidence interval) in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index in the two treatment groups. By repeated measures analysis of all time points, p = 0.032 for the difference in change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index between the treatment groups.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Mean change from baseline (with 95% confidence interval) in left ventricular end-systolic volume index in the two treatment groups. By repeated measures analysis of all time points, p = 0.006 for the difference in change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index between the treatment groups.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Mean change from baseline (with 95% confidence interval) in left ventricular ejection fraction in the two treatment groups. By repeated measures analysis of all time points, p = 0.15 for the difference in change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index between the treatment groups.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement