Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:992-997
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tu, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tu, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, K. M.

Development and validation of the ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules

Jack V. Tu, MD, PhD, FRCPC* e, Peter C. Austin, PhD* e, Randy Walld, BSc{dagger}, Leslie Roos, PhD{dagger}, Jean Agras, PhD{ddagger} and Kathryn M. McDonald, MM§

* Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
e Department of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
{dagger} Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation, Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
{ddagger} National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford, California, USA
§ Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Comparison of predicted versus observed 30-day acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mortality rates in the Ontario derivation dataset. The predicted mortality rates are generated from the Ontario AMI mortality prediction rule. Each data point represents one decile of 5,261 patients from the Ontario derivation dataset, sorted in order of ascending risk. The mean predicted mortality rate is compared to the observed mortality rate within each decile.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement