Advertisement






Click here for more guidelines.
CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 37:1080-1084
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zile, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zile, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, G., IV

Cardiocyte cytoskeleton in patients with left ventricular pressure overload hypertrophy

Michael R. Zile, MD, FACC*, G. Randall Green, MD{dagger}, Gregg T. Schuyler, MD, PhD, FACC*, Gerard P. Aurigemma, MD, FACC{ddagger}, D. Craig Miller, MD, FACC{dagger} and George Cooper, IV, MD*

* Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
{dagger} Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
{ddagger} Cardiology Division of the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA



View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Left ventricular function in control patients and in patients with AS. (Both panels) The solid and parallel dashed lines define the relationship between midwall fractional shortening and mean systolic stress, as well as its 95% prediction interval, and calculated using a least squares linear regression analysis for 84 patients found not to have cardiac pathology. The shortening-stress relationship was characterized as noted in the "Methods" section identically for both the 84 patients used to generate the regression analysis and for the study patients having AS. (Panel A) Individual values for the 15 patients in this study. (Panel B) Summary data for these same patients grouped by functional status. AS = aortic stenosis.

 


View larger version (67K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Representative and summarized myocardial tubulin data for normal patients and patients with AS. (Top) Immunoblot prepared from left ventricular biopsies from one patient from each of the four study groups defined in Figure 1. For comparison of the ratio of free heterodimer (lanes #1) to polymerized microtubule (lanes #2) tubulin in the four biopsies, an equal amount of tubulin protein was loaded for each of the free tubulin lanes, and an equal volume of the polymerized tubulin (microtubule) fraction was loaded for each of the polymerized tubulin lanes. (Bottom) Summary semiquantitative tubulin data for all of the patients in the four groups defined in Figure 1; the values were obtained from immunoblots wherein known quantities of concurrently run pure beta-tubulin were used as a standard, and the integrated optical density of the standards was compared with that of the unknown samples. Statistical analysis by one factor analysis of variance, which showed a significant (p < 0.05) F-ratio, was followed by a Fisher protected least significant difference post-hoc test. *p < 0.05 for difference from the value for the Control group. AS = aortic stenosis.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 The relationship of left ventricle contractile function to left ventricle microtubule protein for all of the patients in the four groups defined in Figure 1. AS = aortic stenosis.

 




 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement